Big news: a new job

Big news: a new job

Next week I start a new job:

Assistant Professor (Teaching Stream) at the Department of Physics and Environmental Sciences (DPES), University of Toronto Scarborough.

This job is an amazing fit for me.

Here’s a few reasons why:

Academia

I’ve wanted a job in science.  But I don’t only want to do science. I want a job that enables me to teach and do public outreach in a meaningful way. I spent a great deal of time and effort over the last decade working in education through NGOs, companies, and at U of T in a variety of roles. I also have a teaching degree. This position is teaching-focused, which is great, in addition to allowing me to continue to do research.

As an academic, I’ll also be able to continue doing science advocacy. Many of my former colleagues have gone to work for government science departments, such as Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC). It’s a nice career path, with stability and important work. But public servants are limited in their ability to criticize government policy, which I’ll be free to do. Given the continuing struggle to keep facilities like PEARL funded, the overall lack of ambition on many science topics, this privilege will be put to good use.

Dan discussing science engagement at U of T's Rawtalk Live event
Dan discussing science engagement at U of T’s Rawtalk Live event (May 30, 2018).

Downtown U of T vs. Scarborough

I’ve spent the last 15 years living and working near downtown. The U of T downtown campus (UTSG) location has clear advantages. There’s an appealing energy and convenience to being close to the core of Canada’s largest city.

Royal Ontario Museum
Royal Ontario Museum

But I wanted a change. I grew up essentially across the street from the Ottawa Greenbelt, and spent the warmer months of the year camping and cottaging in the surrounding rural areas of Ontario. Downtown Toronto doesn’t have enough greenspace. I spent the last several years living next to High Park. It was a great way to find balance. The U of T Scarborough campus has a strong environmental focus and is adjacent to a large forest, which is immensely appealing.

Leaf in High Park on a rainy day
Leaf in High Park on a rainy day

I’ve moved to the east end of Toronto (Upper Beaches), and aim to do part of my commute by bike in the warm months, since there are trails that run from UTSC to GO Transit stations. That’ll be much nicer than biking along College St. to downtown U of T!

UTSC location (from Google Maps)
UTSC location (from Google Maps). Lake Ontario is at the bottom-right. Red marker shows where I’ll be working.

I have to admit one big downside: public transit in Scarborough is badly inadequate. I’m now enthusiastically cheering for Toronto (& other transit-funding levels of government) to build the Eglinton LRT line out to UTSC.

Interdisciplinary department

I’m not joining a physics department. DPES is a mix of physics, chemistry, astronomy, and environmental sciences. That’s also a quick way to summarize my academic background. I did my B.Sc. in astronomy & astrophysics, my M.Sc. in physics, and my Ph.D. in physics with a collaborative program in environmental studies. I’ve also spent considerable time engaged with environmental policy topics. I’m looking forward to interacting with colleagues across these fields. Ideally, I’d like to build a course or two that crosses disciplinary boundaries.

Experimental physics and environmental issues

My specific areas of focus will be exactly my areas of core interest: experimental physics and environmental connections to physics. One of the first large tasks I’m undertaking is a complete re-building of the undergraduate physics laboratory courses. I’m thrilled – this is exactly the type of project I’m keen to do. I’ll also be creating a course on atmospheric physics. Other ideas are floating around, too, but I should leave something for later blog posts.

Dan adjusting beamsplitter door of the PEARL 125HR spectrometer
Dan adjusting beamsplitter door of the PEARL 125HR spectrometer during the 2015 ACE/OSIRIS validation campaign.

Summary

I expect to be (very!) busy for the next few months (years?) as I get started with this exciting new chapter in life. There are challenges ahead. But I’m proceeding with enthusiasm. I’m joining a great institution and department. I’m still close enough to collaborate with my friends downtown at U of T and at ECCC. And if I need the excitement of downtown Toronto, there’s always the weekends.

 

 

 

Two recent cover photos

Recently my photography has been featured in two Canadian science journals.

In between taking measurements of the Canadian high Arctic atmosphere, troubleshooting instruments, and running communications for the research team at PEARL, I took plenty of photos. They’ve been useful for public talks, science communications, and general enjoyment. So far, my photos have found their way into a calendar, major news outlets, a variety of websites, and now the two cover photos.

First up was the Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS) Bulletin. Their December 2016 issue featured a photo of the PEARL research team installing instruments on the roof. These instruments were for satellite validation. I also contributed an article about the fieldwork and a small collection of photos. And, of course, the cover! You can find the excerpt I contributed here:

CMOS Bulletin – Dec. 2016 (Dan Weaver cover and article)

Here’s the cover only:

Canadian Arctic researchers install instruments for ground-based measurements of the atmosphere at PEARL.
CMOS Bulletin cover with my photo taken at PEARL

 

Next was the Physics in Canada Issue 01 of 2017. While it was the first issue of the year, it wasn’t published until June. In any case, my photo is on the cover! The photo is also taken on the PEARL roof. It features the protective enclosure of a sun tracking instrument that sends a beam of sunlight down into the infrared (IR) spectroscopy lab below. I spent plenty of time during campaigns both on the roof and within the IR lab.

Research from colleagues of mine filled the issue. However, there isn’t a way to provide direct links to specific issues on the PiC site.

The cover photo can be seen here:

Physics in Canada – 2017 Iss.01 – Cover (photo by Dan Weaver)

Suntracking instrument housing on the roof of the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL) in the Canadian high Arctic, near Eureka, Nunavut
Physics in Canada (Vol. 73, No. 01) with my photo on the cover.

Canadian Nobel Prize win highlights what’s lost in Harper science policy

It’s inspiring to see a Canadian and a Canadian experiment sharing the 2015 Nobel Prize in physics. This is significant international recognition of Canadian scientific excellence.

I studied the neutrino experiments in Canada and Japan in detail in undergrad physics courses (see this YouTube video for a fun explanation of neutrino oscillation using pies). It’s fascinating science. However, these are example of fundamental research with no obvious or immediate commercial application. Regrettably, our current government has implemented policies that limit this type of science in Canada.

Consider an illustrative example: the current President of Canada’s National Research Council, appointed by the Prime Minister, has stated that “scientific discovery is not valuable unless it has commercial value.” Yikes. I disagree. Commercialization of research and innovation is a good thing. But it shouldn’t come at the expense of basic research. Frequently, research grants now require industry partners. This makes it very difficult for many research streams which may not align with industry wishes. If you cut off fundamental “blue sky” research, you turn off the tap fuelling the technology-driven knowledge economy. It’s short sighted.

When lasers were first invented, they had no immediate applications. It took decades, but eventually their commercial value was immense. Even neutrino research is leading to new technology and ideas with the potential to help with border security (scanning cargo containers for nuclear material), and maybe even mining and communication.  It’s impossible to predict where research into the nature of the universe will go. But it’s worth pursuing.

The Liberals and the NDP both have significant elements in their platforms about supporting Canadian science. The Conservatives? They’ve been cutting research budgets, misunderstanding innovation, and firing scientists for a decade. I can’t find anything about science on their website. It’s time for their “subtle darkening of Canadian life” (as described in a recent NY Times article) to come to an end. It’s time for Canada to step back into the light, and vote for a government that values and supports science this election.